Litigation

Filter





Decided

Ballard v. Dutton

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
Despite repeatedly pleading for protection, Antonio Ballard was brutally assaulted by another prisoner while incarcerated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. When Mr. Ballard sued the officer who failed to protect him, the officer sought to block Mr. Ballard from vindicating his rights by denying that he had a cause of action to challenge the officer’s misconduct.

Ongoing

Spencer v. Barajas, et al.

Access to Courts
Civil plaintiffs have an absolute right to voluntarily withdraw their cases. Yet, when Edward Spencer, an incarcerated plaintiff, did so, a federal district court later punished him by deeming that withdrawal a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). That was wrong.

Decided

Rehanna v. Hollingsworth

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
Kellie Rehanna, a transgender woman who was brutally raped while in the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ custody, has been blocked from vindicating her rights after the Bureau failed to protect her and threatened her into silence. The MacArthur Justice Center is dedicated to ensuring erroneous interpretations of state law do not prevent prisoners from holding prison officials accountable for their egregious actions.

Ongoing

Singleton et al v. Hamm et al.

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
The Alabama Department of Corrections is routinely incarcerating people past their release dates instead of releasing them to parole supervision. The MacArthur Justice Center, along with co-counsel from McGuire & Associates, Covington and Burling, and Kelly Guzzo, is fighting to hold Alabama officials accountable and uphold people's right to go home to their families and communities when their sentences are over.

Decided

Strizich v. Palmer

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
After a correctional officer filed a retaliatory false report against Jory Strizich that placed him in solitary confinement for eight months, Mr. Strizich attempted to get relief but was unable to access the prison’s convoluted grievance process. The MacArthur Justice Center is fighting for prisoners like Mr. Strizich, who are prevented from getting their day in court because of erroneous interpretations of the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s exhaustion provision.

Ongoing

Lauria v. Lieb, et al.

Access to Courts
When Christian Lauria, a pro se prisoner-plaintiff, attempted to obtain legal relief through the Western District of Pennsylvania for a violent assault by corrections officers, the court threw out his case on a technicality—one he had never even been told existed in the first place. The MacArthur Justice Center is fighting to ensure that pro se prisoners like Mr. Lauria get their day in court when they seek to hold corrections officers accountable for wrongdoing.

Ongoing

McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin, et al.

Access to Courts
Terri McGuire-Mollica, proceeding pro se, sued federal prison officials for their years-long failure to treat a painful uterine fibroid that caused severe bleeding and other complications. Although she did everything Bureau of Prisons (BOP) regulations required of her to pursue her claim, the district court wrongly dismissed her case under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s...

Decided

Lieberenz v. Wilson et al.

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
Before Jackson Maes died by suicide in a jail cell, jail officials saw him repeatedly and violently strike his head against a cell wall and heard him say he was trying to kill himself. They still failed to put him on suicide watch or obtain the mental health treatment he needed. The MacArthur Justice Center is fighting to ensure that qualified immunity does not shield jail and prison officials from being held accountable for their often-dangerous indifference toward prisoners’ health and safety.

Ongoing

Barnett v. Short et. al.

Advocating for the Rights of the Incarcerated
Jail officials in Jefferson County, Missouri, held Dewey Austin Barnett II in solitary confinement for a month and deprived him of any access to the Bible throughout that time, violating his right to exercise his religion. The MacArthur Justice Center is fighting to protect the fundamental liberties of people in prison, like the right to...

Decided

Finley v. Huss, et al.

Solitary Confinement
When Timothy Finley was in the midst of a severe mental health spiral, Michigan prison officials responded by imposing on him the one condition they knew was likely to make it worse: months of solitary confinement in a tiny windowless cell. The MacArthur Justice Center is fighting to ensure that incarcerated people like Mr. Finley have their known psychiatric needs taken seriously, not punished with damaging social isolation.